↓ Skip to main content

Inflammation in Coronary Artery Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiology in Review, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inflammation in Coronary Artery Disease
Published in
Cardiology in Review, November 2014
DOI 10.1097/crd.0000000000000006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in the United States. Although CAD was formerly considered a lipid accumulation-mediated disease, it has now been clearly shown to involve an ongoing inflammatory response. Advances in basic science research have established the crucial role of inflammation in mediating all stages of CAD. Today, there is convincing evidence that multiple inter-related immune mechanisms interact with metabolic risk factors to initiate, promote and ultimately activate lesions in the coronary arteries. This review aims to provide current evidence pertaining to the role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of CAD and discusses the impact of inflammatory markers and their modification on clinical outcomes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Colombia 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 185 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Student > Master 22 12%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Other 11 6%
Other 43 23%
Unknown 47 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 10%
Engineering 7 4%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 60 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,487,227
of 32,202,065 outputs
Outputs from Cardiology in Review
#79
of 832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,705
of 294,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiology in Review
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,202,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 832 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.