You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Management and Imaging of Vestibular Schwannomas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a5213 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E.P. Lin, B.T. Crane |
| Abstract |
Vestibular schwannomas are the most common cerebellopontine angle tumor. During the past century, the management goals of vestibular schwannomas have shifted from total resection to functional preservation. Current treatment options include surgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery, and observation. Imaging has become a crucial part of the initial screening, evaluation, and follow-up assessment of vestibular schwannomas. Recognizing and understanding the management objectives, various treatment modalities, expected posttreatment findings, and complications allows the radiologist to play an essential role in a multidisciplinary team by providing key findings relevant to treatment planning and outcome assessment. The authors provide a comprehensive discussion of the surgical management, role of radiation therapy and observation, imaging differential, and pre- and posttreatment imaging findings of vestibular schwannomas. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 7% |
| Spain | 9 | 6% |
| Mexico | 8 | 6% |
| India | 7 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 71 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 97 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 30 | 22% |
| Scientists | 9 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 159 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 20% |
| Unknown | 49 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 46% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 54 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#429,695
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#27
of 5,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,745
of 328,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.