↓ Skip to main content

That instrument is lousy! In search of agreement when using instrumental variables estimation in substance use research

Overview of attention for article published in Health economics (Online), January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
That instrument is lousy! In search of agreement when using instrumental variables estimation in substance use research
Published in
Health economics (Online), January 2011
DOI 10.1002/hec.1572
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 121 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 30%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 45 35%
Social Sciences 16 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 30 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#5,189,789
of 34,609,551 outputs
Outputs from Health economics (Online)
#1,060
of 2,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,798
of 256,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health economics (Online)
#17
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,609,551 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.