↓ Skip to main content

Enhanced external counterpulsation improves peripheral resistance artery blood flow in patients with coronary artery disease

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Enhanced external counterpulsation improves peripheral resistance artery blood flow in patients with coronary artery disease
Published in
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, October 2013
DOI 10.1139/apnm-2013-0309
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) increases coronary artery perfusion and improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in peripheral muscular conduit arteries. It is unknown whether vasodilatory capacity is improved in the peripheral resistance vasculature. Here we provide novel evidence from the first randomized, sham-controlled study that EECP increases peak limb blood flow and improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in both calf and forearm resistance arteries in patients with coronary artery disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Master 2 11%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Sports and Recreations 2 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2014.
All research outputs
#22,369,154
of 27,370,655 outputs
Outputs from Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
#2,001
of 2,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,135
of 228,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
#35
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,370,655 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.