↓ Skip to main content

Book review: Pratyoush Onta, Lokranjan Parajuli and Mark Liechty (Eds), Nepal in the Long 1950s

Overview of attention for article published in South Asia Research, September 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 375)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Book review: Pratyoush Onta, Lokranjan Parajuli and Mark Liechty (Eds), Nepal in the Long 1950s
Published in
South Asia Research, September 2026
DOI 10.1177/02627280261487506
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2026.
All research outputs
#9,328,190
of 34,454,098 outputs
Outputs from South Asia Research
#41
of 375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,880
of 195,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from South Asia Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,454,098 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them