↓ Skip to main content

Resistant starch improves insulin sensitivity in metabolic syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetic Medicine, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 4,693)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
3 Redditors
video
6 YouTube creators
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Resistant starch improves insulin sensitivity in metabolic syndrome
Published in
Diabetic Medicine, April 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02923.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Diets rich in non-viscous fibre are linked to a reduced risk of both diabetes and cardiovascular disease; however, the mechanism of action remains unclear. This study was undertaken to assess whether chronic consumption of this type of fibre in individuals with the metabolic syndrome would improve insulin sensitivity via changes in ectopic fat storage.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 294 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 15%
Student > Master 42 14%
Researcher 40 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 10%
Other 19 6%
Other 49 16%
Unknown 77 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 46 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 9%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 85 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 140. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2026.
All research outputs
#372,767
of 34,357,901 outputs
Outputs from Diabetic Medicine
#26
of 4,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#928
of 146,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetic Medicine
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,357,901 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.