↓ Skip to main content

Chronic nicotine improves short‐term memory selectively in a G72 mouse model of schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Pharmacology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Chronic nicotine improves short‐term memory selectively in a G72 mouse model of schizophrenia
Published in
British Journal of Pharmacology, March 2014
DOI 10.1111/bph.12578
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The prevalence of smoking in schizophrenia patients is exceptionally high; it is not known why but many researchers suggest that smoking constitutes a form of self-medication. Among the symptoms of schizophrenia that may be improved by nicotine are cognitive deficits. Hence, we studied the effects of long-term nicotine administration on cognition in a genetic animal model of schizophrenia susceptibility, G72-transgenic (G72Tg) mice.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 70 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 12%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 18 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 16%
Neuroscience 11 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Psychology 7 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 25 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2025.
All research outputs
#2,406,603
of 32,326,393 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Pharmacology
#481
of 9,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,799
of 271,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Pharmacology
#10
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,326,393 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.