↓ Skip to main content

Prospective Randomized Trial of Two Wound Management Strategies for Dirty Abdominal Wounds

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, March 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prospective Randomized Trial of Two Wound Management Strategies for Dirty Abdominal Wounds
Published in
Annals of Surgery, March 2001
DOI 10.1097/00000658-200103000-00016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 14 16%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Master 9 11%
Other 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 27 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2016.
All research outputs
#5,905,174
of 27,014,701 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#3,512
of 9,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,986
of 45,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,014,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.