↓ Skip to main content

New and emerging therapies for acute myeloid leukaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Investigative Medicine, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
New and emerging therapies for acute myeloid leukaemia
Published in
Journal of Investigative Medicine, December 2018
DOI 10.1136/jim-2018-000807
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julian R Davis, David J Benjamin, Brian A Jonas

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2026.
All research outputs
#6,815,127
of 34,519,212 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Investigative Medicine
#188
of 1,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,423
of 490,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Investigative Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,519,212 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 490,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them