↓ Skip to main content

When Perceptions of Social Desirability Differ: Implications for the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model of Faking

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Psychological Measurement, June 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
When Perceptions of Social Desirability Differ: Implications for the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model of Faking
Published in
Applied Psychological Measurement, June 2026
DOI 10.1177/01466216261460893
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2026.
All research outputs
#9,670,173
of 34,531,973 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychological Measurement
#69
of 603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,730
of 359,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychological Measurement
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,531,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 603 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them