↓ Skip to main content

Preparation and quality evaluation of coffee substitutes based on milk thistle (Silybum marianum L.) seeds.

Overview of attention for article published in Food Science and Technology International, September 2026
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Preparation and quality evaluation of coffee substitutes based on milk thistle (Silybum marianum L.) seeds.
Published in
Food Science and Technology International, September 2026
DOI 10.1177/10820132261489059
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2026.
All research outputs
#28,796,329
of 34,581,411 outputs
Outputs from Food Science and Technology International
#312
of 449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,148
of 243,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Science and Technology International
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,581,411 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 449 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them