↓ Skip to main content

Surgical Identification of the Masseteric Nerve for Facial Reanimation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine, August 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Surgical Identification of the Masseteric Nerve for Facial Reanimation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine, August 2025
DOI 10.1177/26893614251362679
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2026.
All research outputs
#9,672,468
of 34,541,249 outputs
Outputs from Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine
#75
of 328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,225
of 350,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,541,249 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.