↓ Skip to main content

Swept-Source OCT Angiography Shows Sparing of the Choriocapillaris in Multiple Evanescent White Dot Syndrome.

Overview of attention for article published in Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Swept-Source OCT Angiography Shows Sparing of the Choriocapillaris in Multiple Evanescent White Dot Syndrome.
Published in
Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina, January 2017
DOI 10.3928/23258160-20161219-10
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Two women with unilateral vision loss from multiple evanescent white dot syndrome were imaged serially with swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). En face wide-field structural images revealed peripapillary outer photoreceptor disruption better than conventional fundus autofluorescence imaging. OCT angiography (OCTA) imaging showed preservation of flow within the retinal vasculature and choriocapillaris. As OCTA imaging of the choriocapillaris continues to evolve, these images may lay the groundwork for future investigation. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017;48:69-74.].

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Unknown 10 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2017.
All research outputs
#5,338,416
of 27,383,327 outputs
Outputs from Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina
#78
of 1,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,513
of 422,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,383,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,382 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.