↓ Skip to main content

Realigning Incentives In Fee-For-Service Medicare

Overview of attention for article published in Health Affairs, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Realigning Incentives In Fee-For-Service Medicare
Published in
Health Affairs, July 2003
DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.22.4.59
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This paper proposes Medicare payment reform built on the fee-for-service system, with incentive payments to eligible provider organizations determined by their rate of increase in cost per patient compared to the overall growth rate in the community. By planning and monitoring how care patterns are altered to achieve greater efficiency, policy-makers can align the incentives of Medicare and the provider organization better than using either fee-for-service or capitation alone. This reform, unlike capitation, maintains Medicare's historical role as insurer and focuses providers on managing care.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 11%
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 23 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 26%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Other 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 33%
Social Sciences 5 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,793,434
of 29,461,039 outputs
Outputs from Health Affairs
#5,044
of 6,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,023
of 61,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Affairs
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,461,039 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.