↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of Goniometry‐Based Q‐Angle

Overview of attention for article published in PM&R, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reliability of Goniometry‐Based Q‐Angle
Published in
PM&R, March 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.03.023
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To establish the stability reliability, precision, and minimum value for detecting real differences for quadriceps angle (Q-angle) measurements based on standardized protocols and surface goniometry.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 140 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 16%
Student > Master 23 16%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 56 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 13%
Sports and Recreations 17 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 60 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2014.
All research outputs
#19,177,100
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from PM&R
#1,424
of 1,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,625
of 201,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PM&R
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.