↓ Skip to main content

Socially Isolated Children 20 Years Later: Risk of Cardiovascular Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine (Online), August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 2,202)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
40 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
29 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
360 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Socially Isolated Children 20 Years Later: Risk of Cardiovascular Disease
Published in
Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine (Online), August 2006
DOI 10.1001/archpedi.160.8.805
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To test the hypothesis that children who occupy peripheral or isolated roles in their peer groups (isolated children) are at risk of poor adult health.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 353 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 57 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 13%
Researcher 40 11%
Student > Master 33 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 9%
Other 50 14%
Unknown 102 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 92 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 11%
Social Sciences 32 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Other 50 14%
Unknown 118 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 216. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2026.
All research outputs
#226,741
of 34,606,677 outputs
Outputs from Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine (Online)
#35
of 2,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308
of 130,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine (Online)
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,606,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.