↓ Skip to main content

Mistimed sleep disrupts circadian regulation of the human transcriptome

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
55 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
67 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
8 Redditors
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
542 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mistimed sleep disrupts circadian regulation of the human transcriptome
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2014
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1316335111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 542 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 1%
United States 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 512 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 18%
Researcher 88 16%
Student > Bachelor 67 12%
Student > Master 43 8%
Other 29 5%
Other 105 19%
Unknown 114 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 113 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 76 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 65 12%
Neuroscience 45 8%
Psychology 21 4%
Other 78 14%
Unknown 144 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 536. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2025.
All research outputs
#58,586
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,444
of 118,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#385
of 372,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#13
of 962 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 962 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.