↓ Skip to main content

Estiv/Ivts Joint Workshop on the use of Genomics and Proteomics in In Vitro Toxicology

Overview of attention for article published in Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, September 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Estiv/Ivts Joint Workshop on the use of Genomics and Proteomics in In Vitro Toxicology
Published in
Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, September 2001
DOI 10.1177/026119290102900503
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Jenkins

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 100%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2026.
All research outputs
#12,442,446
of 34,565,638 outputs
Outputs from Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
#198
of 526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,504
of 60,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,565,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them