↓ Skip to main content

Poor Transparency of Legal Methods in Empirical Studies of the Effects of Law: A Case Study of Health Policy Research.

Overview of attention for article published in Evaluation Review, August 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

bluesky
4 Bluesky users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Poor Transparency of Legal Methods in Empirical Studies of the Effects of Law: A Case Study of Health Policy Research.
Published in
Evaluation Review, August 2026
DOI 10.1177/0193841x261479457
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2026.
All research outputs
#21,680,308
of 34,581,411 outputs
Outputs from Evaluation Review
#514
of 608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,852
of 343,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evaluation Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,581,411 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them