You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Combining demographic and genetic factors to assess population vulnerability in stream species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1890/13-0499.1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. L. Landguth, C. C. Muhlfeld, R. S. Waples, L. Jones, W. H. Lowe, D. Whited, J. Lucotch, H. Neville, G. Luikart |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#15,585,431
of 24,698,625 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#2,726
of 3,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,372
of 242,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#18
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,698,625 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.