↓ Skip to main content

Increasing the QOF upper payment threshold in general practices in England: impact of implementing government proposals

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Increasing the QOF upper payment threshold in general practices in England: impact of implementing government proposals
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, December 2013
DOI 10.3399/bjgp14x676465
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Caley, Samantha Burn, Tom Marshall, Andrew Rouse

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 29%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,379,032
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,568
of 4,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,449
of 319,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#24
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.