↓ Skip to main content

Family experiences of the transition to palliative care in aged residential care (ARC): a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Palliative Nursing, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Family experiences of the transition to palliative care in aged residential care (ARC): a qualitative study
Published in
International Journal of Palliative Nursing, May 2017
DOI 10.12968/ijpn.2017.23.5.238
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To address a gap in the literature by exploring bereaved families' perceptions of the transition to palliative care for their relative in long-term care. In-depth interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of twenty-six family members who were most involved in the care of residents who had died within the last 12 months. Interviews explored care, perceptions of staff palliative care knowledge, communication with staff, care planning and decision-making. The range of responses fit the Donabedian (1966) health care model of structure/process/outcome. In the case of long-term care, structure includes staff training; process is the manner of care and outcome would be a 'good' (or bad) death. There was little evidence that a well-managed transition to a palliative approach to care was being initiated. Key themes included: 1) unrecognised need for transition; 2) information gaps and 3) feeling 'out of the loop'. Ten subthemes were also identified. Engaging family and relevant internal and external health providers in care planning not only promotes care in line with resident wishes but also assists family bereavement. Results indicate the need for the development of a new collaborative, multidisciplinary model to enhance the delivery of palliative care in long-term care.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 4 5%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 35 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Psychology 5 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 37 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2017.
All research outputs
#13,228,526
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Palliative Nursing
#314
of 601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,034
of 311,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Palliative Nursing
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 601 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.