↓ Skip to main content

Simple modification of arm position improves B1+ and signal homogeneity in the thoracolumbar spine at 3T

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Simple modification of arm position improves B1+ and signal homogeneity in the thoracolumbar spine at 3T
Published in
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, May 2017
DOI 10.1002/jmri.25767
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To evaluate the homogeneity of the radiofrequency magnetic field (B1(+) ) and signal intensity using different arm positions during 3T thoracolumbar spinal imaging. Twenty volunteers were scanned with a four-channel radiofrequency (RF) transmit coil at 3T, with arms on the bed (conventional), arms elevated by 100 mm (arm lift), or with the arms-up position (elevated arm). Axial B1(+) maps and sagittal T1 -weighted image (T1 WI)-performed RF shimming were obtained for each arm position. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the flip angle (FA) at the center of the vertebra on each B1(+) map, and contrast noise ratios (CNRs) between the spinal cord and cerebrospinal fluid of sagittal T1 WI, were calculated and compared among the different arm positions. Mean FA values (degrees) for the arm lift and elevated arm positions were significantly larger than for the conventional position (P < 0.001 for both) at the twelfth thoracic vertebra (Th12). FA SD values for the arm lift and elevated arm position were significantly smaller than for the conventional position (P < 0.001 for both) at Th12. CNR for the arm lift and elevated arm position were significantly higher than for the conventional position (P = 0.007 and 0.002, respectively). The mean and SD of the FA and the CNR did not differ significantly for the arm lift and elevated arm positions (P = 0.591, 0.958, and 0.927, respectively). Inhomogeneities of B1(+) and signal intensities were improved by simply changing the arm position in 3T thoracolumbar spinal imaging. 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 45%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 45%
Engineering 3 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Physics and Astronomy 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2017.
All research outputs
#19,951,550
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
#2,831
of 3,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,687
of 317,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
#33
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,783 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.