↓ Skip to main content

Investigating When and Why Psychological Entitlement Predicts Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
354 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Investigating When and Why Psychological Entitlement Predicts Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10551-017-3456-z
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 354 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 353 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 14%
Student > Master 38 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Student > Bachelor 23 6%
Researcher 17 5%
Other 55 16%
Unknown 146 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 108 31%
Psychology 43 12%
Social Sciences 26 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 154 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,213,370
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#704
of 2,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,921
of 310,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#19
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.