↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

bluesky
4 Bluesky users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Book Review: Framing the First World War: How Divergent Views Shaped a Global Conflict by Michael P. M. Finch, Aimée Fox & David Morgan-Owen Framing the First World War: How Divergent Views Shaped a Global Conflict. Edited byFinchMichael P. M.FoxAiméeMorgan-OwenDavid, Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press, 2025, viii + 327pp. £59.99, ISBN 9780700640560
Published in
War in History, October 2026
DOI 10.1177/09683445261495375
Authors

Richard Dunley

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2026.
All research outputs
#11,538,557
of 34,609,551 outputs
Outputs from War in History
#147
of 536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,581
of 191,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from War in History
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,609,551 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them