↓ Skip to main content

Geographic variation in allergic fungal rhinosinusitis

Overview of attention for article published in Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Geographic variation in allergic fungal rhinosinusitis
Published in
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, April 2000
DOI 10.1016/s0030-6665(00)80018-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

B J Ferguson, L Barnes, J M Bernstein, D Brown, C E Clark, P R Cook, W S DeWitt, S M Graham, B Gordon, A R Javer, J H Krouse, F A Kuhn, H L Levine, S C Manning, B F Marple, A H Morgan, J D Osguthorpe, D Skedros, B M Rains, H H Ramadan, J E Terrell, A J Yonkers

Abstract

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) has a worldwide distribution. This survey of 20 otolaryngologic practices throughout the United States confirmed a variation in the frequency of AFRS relative to endoscopic sinus procedures performed for all other diagnoses. The highest incidence occurred in Memphis, Tennessee at 23%, with three other southern practices reporting a frequency of at least 10%. In the northern locations the frequency ranged from 0 to 4%. No correlation with mould counts was demonstrated, possibly because of incomplete mould data relative to most of the surgical locations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Singapore 1 3%
India 1 3%
Unknown 33 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 12 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 46%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2024.
All research outputs
#6,278,215
of 29,400,575 outputs
Outputs from Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America
#109
of 1,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,633
of 48,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,400,575 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,312 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them