↓ Skip to main content

BBP-functionalized biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds can capture BMP2 and promote osteogenic differentiation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Chemistry B: Materials for biology and medicine, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
BBP-functionalized biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds can capture BMP2 and promote osteogenic differentiation
Published in
Journal of Materials Chemistry B: Materials for biology and medicine, January 2017
DOI 10.1039/c7tb00744b
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs, e.g., BMP2 and 7) are potent mediators for bone repair, however, their clinical use has been limited by their safety and cost-effectiveness. Therefore, innovative strategies that can improve the efficacy of BMPs, and thereby, use a lower dose of exogenous BMPs are highly desired. Inspired by the natural interaction between extracellular matrix (ECM) and growth factors, we hypothesize that bone matrix-mimicking nanofibrous scaffold functionalized with BMP binding moieties can selectively capture and stabilize BMPs, and thereby, promote BMP-induced osteogenic differentiation. To test our hypothesis, a gelatin nanofibrous scaffold was fabricated using thermally induced phase separation together with a porogen leaching technique (TIPS&P) and functionalized by a BMP-binding peptide (BBP) through cross-linking. Our data indicated that BBP decoration largely improved the BMP2 binding and retention capacity of the nanofibrous scaffolds without compromising their macro/microstructure and mechanical properties. Importantly, the BBP-functionalized gelatin scaffolds were able to significantly promote BMP2-induced osteogenic differentiation. Moreover, BBP alone was able to significantly stimulate endogenous BMP2 expression and improve osteogenic differentiation. Compared to other affinity-based drug delivery strategies, e.g., heparin and antibody-mediated growth factor delivering techniques, we expect BBP-functionalized scaffolds will be a safer, more feasible and selective strategy for endogenous BMP stimulating and binding. Therefore, our data suggests a promising application of using the BBP-decorated gelatin nanofibrous scaffold to stimulate/capture BMPs and promote endogenous bone formation in situ in contrast to relying on the administration of high doses of exogenous BMPs and transplantation of cells.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 31%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Materials Science 2 13%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2017.
All research outputs
#31,364,844
of 34,546,575 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Chemistry B: Materials for biology and medicine
#5,732
of 7,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#410,350
of 463,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Chemistry B: Materials for biology and medicine
#409
of 677 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,546,575 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,550 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 677 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.