↓ Skip to main content

When Interpreters Really Are Machines: The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Intercultural Health Care Communication

Overview of attention for article published in Interpreting and Society, October 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
When Interpreters Really Are Machines: The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Intercultural Health Care Communication
Published in
Interpreting and Society, October 2026
DOI 10.1177/27523810261494166
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2026.
All research outputs
#21,879,661
of 34,841,472 outputs
Outputs from Interpreting and Society
#45
of 70 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,056
of 231,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Interpreting and Society
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,841,472 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them