↓ Skip to main content

An Expanded Genome-Wide Association Study of Type 2 Diabetes in Europeans

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 X users
patent
1 patent
reddit
1 Redditor
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
558 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
An Expanded Genome-Wide Association Study of Type 2 Diabetes in Europeans
Published in
Diabetes, May 2017
DOI 10.2337/db16-1253
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert A Scott, Laura J Scott, Reedik Mägi, Letizia Marullo, Kyle J Gaulton, Marika Kaakinen, Natalia Pervjakova, Tune H Pers, Andrew D Johnson, John D Eicher, Anne U Jackson, Teresa Ferreira, Yeji Lee, Clement Ma, Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir, Gudmar Thorleifsson, Lu Qi, Natalie R Van Zuydam, Anubha Mahajan, Han Chen, Peter Almgren, Ben F Voight, Harald Grallert, Martina Müller-Nurasyid, Janina S Ried, William N Rayner, Neil Robertson, Lennart C Karssen, Elisabeth M van Leeuwen, Sara M Willems, Christian Fuchsberger, Phoenix Kwan, Tanya M Teslovich, Pritam Chanda, Man Li, Yingchang Lu, Christian Dina, Dorothee Thuillier, Loic Yengo, Longda Jiang, Thomas Sparso, Hans A Kestler, Himanshu Chheda, Lewin Eisele, Stefan Gustafsson, Mattias Frånberg, Rona J Strawbridge, Rafn Benediktsson, Astradur B Hreidarsson, Augustine Kong, Gunnar Sigurðsson, Nicola D Kerrison, Jian'an Luan, Liming Liang, Thomas Meitinger, Michael Roden, Barbara Thorand, Tõnu Esko, Evelin Mihailov, Caroline Fox, Ching-Ti Liu, Denis Rybin, Bo Isomaa, Valeriya Lyssenko, Tiinamaija Tuomi, David J Couper, James S Pankow, Niels Grarup, Christian T Have, Marit E Jørgensen, Torben Jørgensen, Allan Linneberg, Marilyn C Cornelis, Rob M van Dam, David J Hunter, Peter Kraft, Qi Sun, Sarah Edkins, Katharine R Owen, John RB Perry, Andrew R Wood, Eleftheria Zeggini, Juan Tajes-Fernandes, Goncalo R Abecasis, Lori L Bonnycastle, Peter S Chines, Heather M Stringham, Heikki A Koistinen, Leena Kinnunen, Bengt Sennblad, Thomas W Mühleisen, Markus M Nöthen, Sonali Pechlivanis, Damiano Baldassarre, Karl Gertow, Steve E Humphries, Elena Tremoli, Norman Klopp, Julia Meyer, Gerald Steinbach, Roman Wennauer, Johan G Eriksson, Satu Mӓnnistö, Leena Peltonen, Emmi Tikkanen, Guillaume Charpentier, Elodie Eury, Stéphane Lobbens, Bruna Gigante, Karin Leander, Olga McLeod, Erwin P Bottinger, Omri Gottesman, Douglas Ruderfer, Matthias Blüher, Peter Kovacs, Anke Tonjes, Nisa M Maruthur, Chiara Scapoli, Raimund Erbel, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Susanne Moebus, Ulf de Faire, Anders Hamsten, Michael Stumvoll, Panagiotis Deloukas, Peter J Donnelly, Timothy M Frayling, Andrew T Hattersley, Samuli Ripatti, Veikko Salomaa, Nancy L Pedersen, Bernhard O Boehm, Richard N Bergman, Francis S Collins, Karen L Mohlke, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Torben Hansen, Oluf Pedersen, Inês Barroso, Lars Lannfelt, Erik Ingelsson, Lars Lind, Cecilia M Lindgren, Stephane Cauchi, Philippe Froguel, Ruth JF Loos, Beverley Balkau, Heiner Boeing, Paul W Franks, Aurelio Barricarte Gurrea, Domenico Palli, Yvonne T van der Schouw, David Altshuler, Leif C Groop, Claudia Langenberg, Nicholas J Wareham, Eric Sijbrands, Cornelia M van Duijn, Jose C Florez, James B Meigs, Eric Boerwinkle, Christian Gieger, Konstantin Strauch, Andres Metspalu, Andrew D Morris, Colin NA Palmer, Frank B Hu, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir, Kari Stefansson, Josée Dupuis, Andrew P Morris, Michael Boehnke, Mark I McCarthy, Inga Prokopenko, for the DIAbetes Genetics Replication And Meta-analysis Consortium

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 558 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 557 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 99 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 13%
Student > Master 55 10%
Student > Bachelor 44 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 5%
Other 93 17%
Unknown 168 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 136 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 88 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 2%
Engineering 11 2%
Other 73 13%
Unknown 195 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,571,054
of 34,318,950 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes
#601
of 12,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,253
of 365,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes
#8
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,318,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.