↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Management and Tumor Surveillance Recommendations of Inherited Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Childhood

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical Management and Tumor Surveillance Recommendations of Inherited Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Childhood
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, May 2017
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-0574
Pubmed ID
Authors

Uri Tabori, Jordan R. Hansford, Maria Isabel Achatz, Christian P. Kratz, Sharon E. Plon, Thierry Frebourg, Laurence Brugières

Abstract

Replication proofreading is crucial to avoid mutation accumulation in dividing cells. In humans, proofreading and replication repair is maintained by the exonuclease domains of DNA polymerases and the mismatch repair system. Individuals harboring germline mutations in genes involved in this process are at increased risk of early cancers from multiple organs. Biallelic mutations in any of the four mismatch repair genes MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, and PMS2 result in one of the most aggressive childhood cancer predisposition syndromes, termed constitutional mismatch repair deficiency or constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome (CMMRD). Data gathered in the last decade allow us to better define the clinical manifestations, tumor spectrum, and diagnostic algorithms for CMMRD. In this article, we summarize this information and present a comprehensive consensus surveillance protocol for these individuals. Ongoing research will allow for further definition of replication repair-deficient cancer syndromes, assessing the cost-effectiveness of such surveillance protocols and potential therapeutic interventions for these children and families. Clin Cancer Res; 23(11); e32-e37. ©2017 AACRSee all articles in the online-only CCR Pediatric Oncology Series.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 155 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 22%
Other 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 37 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 47 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,690,361
of 25,473,687 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#1,226
of 13,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,151
of 330,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#34
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,473,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.