↓ Skip to main content

A new algorithm for calculating optimal viewing angles in coronary angiography based on 4-D cardiac computed tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of X-Ray Science & Technology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A new algorithm for calculating optimal viewing angles in coronary angiography based on 4-D cardiac computed tomography
Published in
Journal of X-Ray Science & Technology, March 2014
DOI 10.3233/xst-140415
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2026.
All research outputs
#12,533,545
of 34,782,165 outputs
Outputs from Journal of X-Ray Science & Technology
#61
of 301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,671
of 267,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of X-Ray Science & Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,782,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 301 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them