↓ Skip to main content

Prevention of Post-Stroke Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Using Escitalopram or Problem-Solving Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prevention of Post-Stroke Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Using Escitalopram or Problem-Solving Therapy
Published in
Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, November 2014
DOI 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.11020047
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study examined the efficacy of antidepressant treatment for preventing the onset of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) among patients with recent stroke. Of 799 patients assessed, 176 were randomized, and 149 patients without evidence of GAD at the initial visit were included in this double-blind treatment with escitalopram (N=47) or placebo (N=49) or non-blinded problem-solving therapy (PST; 12 total sessions; N=53). Participants given placebo over 12 months were 4.95 times more likely to develop GAD than patients given escitalopram and 4.00 times more likely to develop GAD than patients given PST. Although these results should be considered preliminary, the authors found that both escitalopram and PST were effective in preventing new onset of post-stroke GAD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 31 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Psychology 13 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 35 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2014.
All research outputs
#28,225,064
of 33,977,172 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
#1,383
of 1,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,669
of 307,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
#23
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,977,172 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.