↓ Skip to main content

Polyphyletic origin of toxic Pitohui birds suggests widespread occurrence of toxicity in corvoid birds

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Letters, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Polyphyletic origin of toxic Pitohui birds suggests widespread occurrence of toxicity in corvoid birds
Published in
Biology Letters, December 2007
DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0464
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Pitohui birds from New Guinea have been found to contain a toxin otherwise only found in neotropical poison arrow frogs. Pitohuis have been considered to be monophyletic and thus toxicity is thought to have evolved once in birds. Here, we show that Pitohuis, rather than being a tight-knit group, are polyphyletic and represent several lineages among the corvoid families of passerine birds. This finding demonstrates that the ability to be toxic is widespread among corvoid birds and suggests that additional members of this radiation, comprising more than 700 species, could prove to be toxic. It is postulated that toxic birds ingest the toxin through their insect diet and excrete it through the uropygial gland, from where it is applied to the skin and feathers. Thus, the ability to become toxic is most likely an ancestral condition but variation in diet determines the extent to which toxicity is expressed among corvoid birds. Variability in toxicity levels further suggests that the main function of the toxin is that of a deterrent against ectoparasites and bacterial infection rather than being a defence against predators as initially proposed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
New Zealand 2 2%
South Africa 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
France 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Costa Rica 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 72 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 61%
Environmental Science 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2025.
All research outputs
#838,246
of 32,692,245 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#792
of 3,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,073
of 216,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,692,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.