↓ Skip to main content

Using balanced metrics and mixed methods to better understand QI interventions

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Quality & Safety, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Using balanced metrics and mixed methods to better understand QI interventions
Published in
BMJ Quality & Safety, January 2014
DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002829
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 24%
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Other 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 17%
Social Sciences 9 13%
Decision Sciences 5 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 11 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2017.
All research outputs
#3,281,103
of 32,611,522 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#910
of 2,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,867
of 360,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#17
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,611,522 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.