↓ Skip to main content

Fecal Biomarkers of Intestinal Health and Disease in Children

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fecal Biomarkers of Intestinal Health and Disease in Children
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fped.2014.00006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The identification of various fecal biomarkers has provided insight into the intestinal milieu. Most of these markers are associated with the innate immune system of the gut, apart from the more novel M2-pyruvate kinase. The innate immunity of the gut plays a role in maintaining a fine balance between tolerance to commensal bacteria and immune response to potential pathogens. It is a complex system, which comprises of multiple elements, including antimicrobial peptides (e.g., defensins, cathelicidins, lactoferrin, and osteoprotegerin), inflammatory proteins (e.g., calprotectin and S100A12), and microbial products (e.g., short-chain fatty acids). Dysfunction of any component can lead to the development of intestinal disease, and different diseases have been associated with different fecal levels of these biomarkers. Each fecal biomarker provides information on specific biological and disease processes. Therefore, stool quantification of these biomarkers provides a non-invasive method to define potential pathways behind the pathogenesis of diseases and can assist in the assessment and diagnosis of various gastrointestinal conditions. The abovementioned fecal biomarkers and their role in intestinal health and disease will be reviewed in this paper with a pediatric focus.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 156 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 17%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Other 8 5%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 39 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 4%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 45 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2014.
All research outputs
#20,217,843
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#4,088
of 5,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,742
of 305,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.