↓ Skip to main content

Neurocognition, functional capacity, and functional outcomes: The cost of inexperience

Overview of attention for article published in Schizophrenia Research, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Neurocognition, functional capacity, and functional outcomes: The cost of inexperience
Published in
Schizophrenia Research, August 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2013.08.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Neurocognitive impairments are the strongest predictor of functional deficits in schizophrenia, but adaptive (i.e., functional) capacity, typically measured with performance-based assessments, yields an objective index of current abilities, whereas real-world functional performance relies on observations of community activity. However, limited experiences in the community may limit the acquisition, retention, or expression of these skills.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 88 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 23%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 38 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 25 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Schizophrenia Research
#5,069
of 5,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,815
of 211,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Schizophrenia Research
#67
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.