↓ Skip to main content

Stillbirth During Infection With Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Infectious Diseases, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
16 X users
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Stillbirth During Infection With Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus
Published in
Journal of Infectious Diseases, January 2014
DOI 10.1093/infdis/jiu068
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We conducted an epidemiologic investigation among survivors of an outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection in Jordan. A second-trimester stillbirth occurred during the course of an acute respiratory illness that was attributed to MERS-CoV on the basis of exposure history and positive results of MERS-CoV serologic testing. This is the first occurrence of stillbirth during an infection with MERS-CoV and may have bearing upon the surveillance and management of pregnant women in settings of unexplained respiratory illness potentially due to MERS-CoV. Future prospective investigations of MERS-CoV should ascertain pregnancy status and obtain further pregnancy-related data, including biological specimens for confirmatory testing.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 129 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Other 6 5%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 34 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 39 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 271. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#168,106
of 34,536,218 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#183
of 19,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,264
of 375,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#1
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,536,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.