↓ Skip to main content

Bio-oil from fast pyrolysis of lignin: Effects of process and upgrading parameters

Overview of attention for article published in Bioresource Technology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
426 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bio-oil from fast pyrolysis of lignin: Effects of process and upgrading parameters
Published in
Bioresource Technology, May 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.129
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Effects of process parameters on the yield and chemical profile of bio-oil from fast pyrolysis of lignin and the processes for lignin-derived bio-oil upgrading were reviewed. Various process parameters including pyrolysis temperature, reactor types, lignin characteristics, residence time, and feeding rate were discussed and the optimal parameter conditions for improved bio-oil yield and quality were concluded. In terms of lignin-derived bio-oil upgrading, three routes including pretreatment of lignin, catalytic upgrading, and co-pyrolysis of hydrogen-rich materials have been investigated. Zeolite cracking and hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) treatment are two main methods for catalytic upgrading of lignin-derived bio-oil. Factors affecting zeolite activity and the main zeolite catalytic mechanisms for lignin conversion were analyzed. Noble metal-based catalysts and metal sulfide catalysts are normally used as the HDO catalysts and the conversion mechanisms associated with a series of reactions have been proposed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 426 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 426 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 12%
Researcher 49 12%
Student > Bachelor 38 9%
Other 19 4%
Other 65 15%
Unknown 144 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 93 22%
Chemistry 50 12%
Engineering 44 10%
Energy 20 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 3%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 173 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,391,297
of 33,982,974 outputs
Outputs from Bioresource Technology
#1,828
of 12,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,759
of 359,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioresource Technology
#42
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,982,974 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,041 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.