↓ Skip to main content

The emotional Stroop task and emotionality rating of negative and neutral words in late Thai–English bilinguals

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Psychology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The emotional Stroop task and emotionality rating of negative and neutral words in late Thai–English bilinguals
Published in
International Journal of Psychology, February 2014
DOI 10.1080/00207594.2013.793800
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The current study investigated how emotions are represented in the lexicon of late Thai-English bilinguals and a comparison group of native English speakers. Two tasks were used. In the emotional Stroop task, which taps into an automatic early lexical level of processing, the bilingual participants did not display the same automatic level of activation in their second language (L2) as in their first language (L1). In the emotionality-rating task, which involves a later, more in-depth conscious level of processing than the preceding task, similar results were found in both languages spoken by the bilinguals. These findings are interpreted as indicating that late bilinguals do not automatically respond to the emotional arousal associated with the meanings of L2 words to the same extent as in the L1, and this is likely to be mediated by language proficiency and the context in which the language is learned.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 23 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 38%
Linguistics 14 16%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 25 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,213,884
of 24,851,605 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Psychology
#555
of 697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,044
of 319,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Psychology
#14
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,851,605 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.