↓ Skip to main content

Spectral Organization of the Human Lateral Superior Temporal Gyrus Revealed by Intracranial Recordings

Overview of attention for article published in Cerebral Cortex, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Spectral Organization of the Human Lateral Superior Temporal Gyrus Revealed by Intracranial Recordings
Published in
Cerebral Cortex, October 2012
DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhs314
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The place of the posterolateral superior temporal (PLST) gyrus within the hierarchical organization of the human auditory cortex is unknown. Understanding how PLST processes spectral information is imperative for its functional characterization. Pure-tone stimuli were presented to subjects undergoing invasive monitoring for refractory epilepsy. Recordings were made using high-density subdural grid electrodes. Pure tones elicited robust high gamma event-related band power responses along a portion of PLST adjacent to the transverse temporal sulcus (TTS). Responses were frequency selective, though typically broadly tuned. In several subjects, mirror-image response patterns around a low-frequency center were observed, but typically, more complex and distributed patterns were seen. Frequency selectivity was greatest early in the response. Classification analysis using a sparse logistic regression algorithm yielded above-chance accuracy in all subjects. Classifier performance typically peaked at 100-150 ms after stimulus onset, was comparable for the left and right hemisphere cases, and was stable across stimulus intensities. Results demonstrate that representations of spectral information within PLST are temporally dynamic and contain sufficient information for accurate discrimination of tone frequencies. PLST adjacent to the TTS appears to be an early stage in the hierarchy of cortical auditory processing. Pure-tone response patterns may aid auditory field identification.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Germany 3 3%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 98 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 21%
Psychology 17 16%
Neuroscience 15 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 9%
Engineering 7 7%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 25 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2014.
All research outputs
#18,361,534
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Cerebral Cortex
#4,019
of 4,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,874
of 172,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cerebral Cortex
#52
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.