↓ Skip to main content

Infant feeding and analgesia in labour: the evidence is accumulating

Overview of attention for article published in International Breastfeeding Journal, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Infant feeding and analgesia in labour: the evidence is accumulating
Published in
International Breastfeeding Journal, December 2006
DOI 10.1186/1746-4358-1-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sue Jordan

Abstract

The interesting and important paper by Torvaldsen and colleagues provides further circumstantial evidence of a positive association between intrapartum analgesia and feeding infant formula. Not all research supports this association. Before 'failure to breastfeed' can be adjudged an adverse effect of intrapartum analgesia, the research evidence needs to be considered in detail. Examination of the existing evidence against the Bradford-Hill criteria indicates that the evidence is not yet conclusive. However, the difficulties of obtaining funding and undertaking large trials to explore putative adverse drug reactions in pregnant women may mean that we shall never have conclusive evidence of harm. Therefore, reports of large cohort studies with regression models, as in the paper published today, assume a greater importance than in other areas of investigation. Meanwhile, women and their clinicians may feel that sufficient evidence has accumulated to justify offering extra support to establish breastfeeding if women have received high doses of analgesics in labour.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
South Africa 1 3%
Unknown 26 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 20%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 8 27%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 33%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Breastfeeding Journal
#399
of 608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,926
of 169,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Breastfeeding Journal
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.