↓ Skip to main content

Nanoallergens: A multivalent platform for studying and evaluating potency of allergen epitopes in cellular degranulation

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Biology and Medicine, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nanoallergens: A multivalent platform for studying and evaluating potency of allergen epitopes in cellular degranulation
Published in
Experimental Biology and Medicine, April 2016
DOI 10.1177/1535370216644533
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 39%
Other 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 22%
Chemistry 3 13%
Chemical Engineering 2 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2024.
All research outputs
#7,531,132
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Biology and Medicine
#1,009
of 3,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,086
of 301,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Biology and Medicine
#13
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.