↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Not All Measures of Hyperinflation Are Created Equal Lung Structure and Clinical Correlates of Gas Trapping and Hyperexpansion in COPD: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) COPD Study
Published in
CHEST, June 2014
DOI 10.1378/chest.13-1884
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Hyperinflation refers to a nonspecific increase in absolute lung volumes and has a poor prognosis in COPD. The relative contribution of increased airways resistance and increased parenchymal compliance to hyperinflation of each absolute lung volume is poorly understood. We hypothesized that increased residual volume (RV) and RV/total lung capacity (TLC) would be associated with reduced airway lumen dimensions, whereas increased functional residual capacity (FRC), TLC, and reduced inspiratory capacity (IC)/TLC would be associated with emphysema on CT scan. We examined whether clinical characteristics differed accordingly.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 17 25%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2014.
All research outputs
#10,163,750
of 34,517,289 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#9,149
of 18,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,107
of 274,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#60
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,517,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.