↓ Skip to main content

Functional consequences of neuropeptide and small-molecule co-transmission

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Functional consequences of neuropeptide and small-molecule co-transmission
Published in
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, June 2017
DOI 10.1038/nrn.2017.56
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Colocalization of small-molecule and neuropeptide transmitters is common throughout the nervous system of all animals. The resulting co-transmission, which provides conjoint ionotropic ('classical') and metabotropic ('modulatory') actions, includes neuropeptide- specific aspects that are qualitatively different from those that result from metabotropic actions of small-molecule transmitter release. Here, we focus on the flexibility afforded to microcircuits by such co-transmission, using examples from various nervous systems. Insights from such studies indicate that co-transmission mediated even by a single neuron can configure microcircuit activity via an array of contributing mechanisms, operating on multiple timescales, to enhance both behavioural flexibility and robustness.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 314 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 22%
Researcher 52 16%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Student > Master 20 6%
Student > Postgraduate 17 5%
Other 56 18%
Unknown 84 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 108 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 5%
Chemistry 5 2%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 95 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,692,145
of 32,797,349 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#1,023
of 3,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,360
of 356,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#16
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,797,349 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.