↓ Skip to main content

Expression and characterization of a codon‐optimized blood coagulation factor VIII

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thrombosis & Haemostasis, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
10 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Expression and characterization of a codon‐optimized blood coagulation factor VIII
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis & Haemostasis, February 2017
DOI 10.1111/jth.13632
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Production of recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) is challenging due to its low expression. It was previously shown that codon-optimization of a B domain-deleted FVIII (BDD-FVIII) cDNA resulted in increased protein expression. However, it is well-recognized that synonymous mutations may affect the protein structure and function. To compare biochemical properties of a BDD-FVIII expressed from codon-optimized (CO) and the wild-type (WT) cDNAs. Each variant of the BDD-FVIII was expressed in several independent CHO cell lines, generated using a lentiviral platform. The proteins were purified by two-step affinity chromatography and analyzed in parallel by: PAGE-Western blot (including thrombin cleavage), mass-spectrometry, circular dichroism, surface plasmon resonance, chromogenic, clotting and thrombin generation assays. The average yield of the CO was 7-fold higher than WT, while both proteins were identical in the amino acid sequences (99% coverage) and very similar in patterns of the molecular fragments (before and after thrombin cleavage), glycosylation and tyrosine sulfation, secondary structures and binding to von Willebrand factor and to a fragment of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1. The CO preparations had averagely 1.5-fold higher FVIII specific activity (activity normalized to protein mass) than WT preparations, which was attributed to better preservation of the CO structure due to considerably higher protein concentrations during the production. We concluded that the codon-optimization of the BDD-FVIII resulted in significant increase of its expression and did not affect the structure-function properties. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Other 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 33 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 32 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2026.
All research outputs
#6,686,052
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thrombosis & Haemostasis
#1,834
of 5,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,341
of 352,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thrombosis & Haemostasis
#23
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.