↓ Skip to main content

Personalizing Nursing Home Compare and the Discharge from Hospitals to Nursing Homes

Overview of attention for article published in Health Services Research, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Personalizing Nursing Home Compare and the Discharge from Hospitals to Nursing Homes
Published in
Health Services Research, October 2016
DOI 10.1111/1475-6773.12588
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To test whether use of a personalized report card, Nursing Home Compare Plus (NHCPlus), embedded in a reengineered discharge process, can lead to better outcomes than the usual discharge process from hospitals to nursing homes. Primary data collected in the Departments of Medicine and Surgery at a University Medical Center between March 2014 and August 2015. A randomized controlled trial in which patients in the intervention group were given NHCPlus. Participants included 225 patients or their family members/surrogates. Key strokes of NHCPlus users were recorded to obtain information about usage. Users were surveyed about usability and satisfaction with NHCPlus. All participants were surveyed at discharge from the hospital. Survey data were merged with medical records. About 85 percent of users indicated satisfaction with NHCPlus. Compared to controls, intervention patients were more satisfied with the choice process (by 40 percent of the standard deviation p < .01), more likely to go to higher ranked five-star nursing homes (OR = 1.8, p < .05), traveled to further nursing homes (IRR = 1.27, p < .10), and had shorter hospital stays (IRR = 0.84, p < .05). Personalizing report cards and reengineering the discharge process may improve quality and may lower costs compared to the usual discharge process.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 145 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 20 14%
Student > Master 17 12%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 34 23%
Unknown 43 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 41 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 10%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Psychology 5 3%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 52 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2017.
All research outputs
#19,282,091
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Health Services Research
#2,198
of 2,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,656
of 319,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Services Research
#37
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.