↓ Skip to main content

Spectral Response of Plasmonic Gold Nanoparticles to Capacitive Charging: Morphology Effects

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Spectral Response of Plasmonic Gold Nanoparticles to Capacitive Charging: Morphology Effects
Published in
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, June 2017
DOI 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00945
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We report a study of the shape-dependent spectral response of the gold nanoparticle surface plasmon resonance at various electron densities to provide mechanistic insight into the role of capacitive charging, a topic of some debate. We demonstrate a morphology dependent spectral response for gold nanoparticles due to capacitive charging using single-particle spectroscopy in an inert electrochemical environment. A decrease in plasmon energy and increase in spectral width for gold nanospheres and nanorods was observed as the electron density was tuned through a potential window of -0.3 to 0.1 V. The combined observations could not be explained by existing theories. A new quantum theory for charging based on the random phase approximation was developed. Additionally, the redox reaction of gold oxide formation was probed using single-particle plasmon voltammetry to reproduce the reduction peak from the bulk cyclic voltammetry. These results deepen our understanding of the relationship between optical and electronic properties in plasmonic nanoparticles and provide insight towards their potential applications in directed electrocatalysis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 31%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 30 42%
Physics and Astronomy 14 19%
Materials Science 7 10%
Engineering 4 6%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 13 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2026.
All research outputs
#11,422,092
of 32,436,195 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
#3,544
of 11,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,116
of 355,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
#47
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,436,195 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.