↓ Skip to main content

Amyloid β–associated cognitive decline in the absence of clinical disease progression and systemic illness

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Amyloid β–associated cognitive decline in the absence of clinical disease progression and systemic illness
Published in
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, June 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.dadm.2017.05.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

High levels of amyloid β (Aβ) are associated with cognitive decline in cognitively normal (CN) older adults. This study investigated the nature of cognitive decline in healthy individuals who did not progress to mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Cognition was measured over 72 months and compared between low (Aβ-) and high (Aβ+) CN older adults (n = 335) who did not progress to mild cognitive impairment or dementia and who remained free of severe or uncontrolled systemic illness. Compared to the Aβ- group, the Aβ+ group showed no cognitive impairment at baseline but showed substantial decline in verbal learning, episodic memory, and attention over 72 months. Moderate cognitive decline, particularly for learning and memory, was associated with Aβ+ in CN older adults in the absence of clinical disease progression and uncontrolled or serious comorbid illness.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 28 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 16%
Psychology 10 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 32 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,618,371
of 27,521,961 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
#401
of 952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,693
of 338,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,521,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.