↓ Skip to main content

MAGELLAN: A Cognitive Map–Based Model of Human Wayfinding

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
MAGELLAN: A Cognitive Map–Based Model of Human Wayfinding
Published in
Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, June 2014
DOI 10.1037/a0035542
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In an unfamiliar environment, searching for and navigating to a target requires that spatial information be acquired, stored, processed, and retrieved. In a study encompassing all of these processes, participants acted as taxicab drivers who learned to pick up and deliver passengers in a series of small virtual towns. We used data from these experiments to refine and validate MAGELLAN, a cognitive map-based model of spatial learning and wayfinding. MAGELLAN accounts for the shapes of participants' spatial learning curves, which measure their experience-based improvement in navigational efficiency in unfamiliar environments. The model also predicts the ease (or difficulty) with which different environments are learned and, within a given environment, which landmarks will be easy (or difficult) to localize from memory. Using just 2 free parameters, MAGELLAN provides a useful account of how participants' cognitive maps evolve over time with experience, and how participants use the information stored in their cognitive maps to navigate and explore efficiently. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 141 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 32%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 20%
Computer Science 19 13%
Engineering 12 8%
Design 12 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Other 34 23%
Unknown 31 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2016.
All research outputs
#23,324,569
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
#2,073
of 2,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,788
of 273,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.