↓ Skip to main content

Effective use of SexedULTRA™ sex-sorted semen for timed artificial insemination of beef heifers

Overview of attention for article published in Theriogenology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effective use of SexedULTRA™ sex-sorted semen for timed artificial insemination of beef heifers
Published in
Theriogenology, March 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.03.018
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

An experiment was designed to evaluate the relative fertility of SexedULTRA(TM) sex-sorted semen compared to conventional, non-sex-sorted semen when used among beef heifers in conjunction with split-time AI following the 14-d CIDR-PG protocol. Units of conventional semen were generated with 25.0 × 10(6) live cells per 0.5 ml straw prior to freezing, and units of sex-sorted semen were generated using the SexedULTRA(TM) Genesis III sorting technology with 4.0 × 10(6) live cells per 0.25 ml straw prior to freezing. Sex-sorted units were sorted to contain X chromosome-bearing sperm cells at an accuracy level of >90%. Estrus was synchronized in 851 heifers at four locations using the 14-d CIDR-PG protocol: controlled internal drug release (CIDR) insert (1.38 g progesterone) on Day 0, CIDR removal on Day 14, and administration of prostaglandin F2α (PG; 25 mg im) on Day 30. Estrus detection aids were applied at PG on Day 30 to evaluate estrous response rate, and split-time AI was performed based on estrous response. At 66 h after PG (Day 33), heifers having expressed estrus received timed AI. Heifers failing to express estrus by 66 h received timed AI 24 h later (90 h after PGF2α on Day 34). Heifers failing to express estrus by 90 h were administered gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH; 100 μg im) concurrent with AI. Heifers were preassigned to treatment (insemination with either conventional or SexedULTRA(TM) sex-sorted semen), and treatments were balanced within each location based on source, reproductive tract score, and weight. Heifers were exposed for natural service beginning 14 d after AI for the remainder of a 60 d breeding season. Pregnancy rates to AI across locations tended to be higher (P = 0.09) for heifers inseminated with conventional semen (60%; 257/429) compared to sex-sorted semen (52%; 218/422). Higher pregnancy rates to AI (P < 0.0001) were obtained among heifers that expressed estrus prior to AI than among heifers that failed to express estrus prior to AI at 90 h. Total pregnancy rates at the end of the 60 d breeding season did not differ between heifers that received sex-sorted semen at AI (89%; 376/422) and heifers that received conventional semen at AI (89%; 382/429). In summary, the pregnancy rates observed suggest that SexedULTRA(TM) sex-sorted semen can be used effectively for timed AI of beef heifers when split-time AI is performed following the 14-d CIDR-PG protocol.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Master 10 11%
Other 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 29 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 22 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 37 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Theriogenology
#2,485
of 3,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,198
of 322,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theriogenology
#35
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,238 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.